Home / Crash Investigations / Helios Airways Flight 522

Helios Airways Flight 522

AAIASB investigation14 Aug 200511 min readUpdated Sep 2026
Final report · AAIASB · Oct 2006
PressurisationIncapacitationMaintenanceCRMHuman factors
Date
Phase of flight
Climb
Location
Near Grammatiko, about 33 km northwest of Athens International Airport, Greece
Aircraft
Boeing 737-31S (737-300)
Registration
5B-DBY
Operator
Helios Airways
Flight
Helios Airways 522 (HCY522)
Occupants
121
Fatalities
121115 passengers and 6 crew members
Investigating body
Air Accident Investigation and Aviation Safety Board (Hellenic Republic)
Final report
AAIASB 11/2006
Report date
Report title
Aircraft Accident Report: Helios Airways Flight HCY522, Boeing 737-31S, at Grammatiko, Hellas, on 14 August 2005
In brief

On 14 August 2005 a Helios Airways Boeing 737 climbed out of Larnaca with its pressurisation mode selector in MAN. The crew misread the cabin altitude warning and were incapacitated by hypoxia, and the aircraft flew on autopilot until its fuel ran out, crashing near Grammatiko, Greece. All 121 on board died.

On 14 August 2005 Helios Airways flight HCY522, a Boeing 737-300 registered 5B-DBY, took off from Larnaca, Cyprus, for Prague via Athens with 115 passengers and 6 crew members. Its pressurisation system was not in automatic mode, and as the aircraft climbed the cabin climbed with it. The pilots did not recognise the cabin altitude warning, were overcome by hypoxia, and the aircraft flew on under the autopilot and flight management computer until its fuel ran out. It struck hilly terrain near the village of Grammatiko, about 33 km northwest of Athens International Airport, killing everyone on board.

The Hellenic Air Accident Investigation and Aviation Safety Board (AAIASB) traced the accident to a switch left in the wrong position after maintenance, three missed checks, a warning horn with two meanings, and a crew that never diagnosed a pressurisation problem before hypoxia took away their ability to do so. Behind these lay weaknesses in the operator's organisation, in the oversight exercised by the Cyprus Department of Civil Aviation, and in the manufacturer's response to earlier incidents.

The report gives all times in UTC; local time in Greece was UTC + 3 hours.

On this page
  1. The flight
  2. The accident
  3. The investigation
  4. Probable cause and contributing factors
  5. Safety recommendations and what changed
  6. Lessons for pilots
  7. Train this on v1prep
  8. Frequently asked questions

The flight

5B-DBY was a Boeing 737-31S built in 1998 and acquired by Helios Airways in April 2004. It had CFM56-3C1 engines and 142 seats, and its mass and centre of gravity were within limits. The captain, aged 59 and a German national, had 16,900 hours, 5,500 of them as pilot in command of the 737. The first officer, aged 51, had 7,549 hours, 3,991 of them on the 737. Both were rested. The first officer's training files over five years contained numerous remarks about checklist discipline and standard operating procedures.

On the previous flight, from London Heathrow, the cabin crew had reported that the seal of the right aft service door froze and that hard bangs were heard. After landing at Larnaca at 01:25, a ground engineer inspected the door and ran a cabin pressure leak check, a test that requires the pressurisation mode selector to be set to MAN. The aircraft was released at 03:15.

On the 737 the digital cabin pressure control system has three modes. In AUTO or ALTN a controller moves the outflow valve to follow a pressure schedule. In MAN the valve moves only when a pilot drives it with a toggle switch, and a green MANUAL light shows the mode. Data from the pressure controller's memory showed that on the accident flight the system was in manual mode with the outflow valve fixed at 14.6° open, the position in which its actuator was later found. The Board was led to believe that the selector had stayed in MAN since the leak test, the last known time it had been moved.

The Helios Airways Boeing 737-300 5B-DBY.
The accident aircraft, Helios Airways Boeing 737-31S 5B-DBY, photographed before the accident.Mila Daniel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

The accident

HCY522 took off at 06:07:13. With the outflow valve fixed open, the cabin altitude rose at about 2,000 ft per minute, far faster than in automatic mode.

Time (UTC) Event
06:11:45 Cleared to FL340 direct to the RDS (Rodos) VOR; the captain's read-back is the crew's last exchange with ATC
06:12:38 Cabin altitude warning horn sounds at 12,040 ft, cabin altitude 10,000 ft
06:14:11 At about 16,000 ft the captain calls the company, reporting a "take-off configuration warning" and equipment cooling problems
about 06:14 Passenger oxygen masks deploy at about 18,200 ft, as the cabin passes 14,000 ft
06:20:21 Last radio transmission from the flight deck, climbing through 28,900 ft
06:23:32 Aircraft levels off at FL340 and continues on its programmed route
07:37:39 After passing the KEA VOR and overflying Athens International Airport at FL340, enters the KEA holding pattern
08:23:51 Intercepted by two Hellenic Air Force F-16s during the sixth holding pattern
08:49:50 Left engine flames out from fuel exhaustion; the aircraft leaves the hold and descends
08:54:18 "MAYDAY" recorded on the cockpit voice recorder but not transmitted
08:59:47 Right engine flames out at 7,084 ft
09:03:32 Impact near Grammatiko

When the horn sounded, the crew disconnected the autopilot, retarded the thrust levers and then re-engaged the automatics, actions consistent with a take-off configuration warning. At about 17,000 to 18,000 ft the master caution came on and was not cancelled for 53 seconds. At about this time the equipment cooling sensors, reacting to the thinner air, lit the cooling lights, and the passenger oxygen masks deployed, lighting the PASS OXY ON light. The captain discussed the cooling lights with the company's ground engineer, who asked him to confirm that the pressurisation panel was set to AUTO. The captain instead asked where the equipment cooling circuit breakers were, and was told they were behind his seat. The Board found that language difficulties prolonged the exchange while the aircraft kept climbing.

From 06:30 Nicosia and then Athinai controllers called the flight repeatedly without reply. The F-16 pilot reported at 08:32 that the captain's seat was empty, the person in the first officer's seat was slumped over the controls, and passengers could be seen motionless wearing oxygen masks. At about 08:49 he saw a man enter the cockpit and take the captain's seat; he was a cabin attendant who had trained as a pilot. Shortly afterwards the left engine flamed out, and the aircraft descended in a left turn, with fluctuating speed and altitude.

The investigation

A selector left in MAN

The AAIASB found inconsistencies between the maintenance actions reported and the log entries, and noted that the engineer did not brief the flight crew. The Boeing maintenance manual's final step, "Put the Airplane Back to its Initial Condition", listed three actions, none of which was returning the mode selector to AUTO. The Board did not treat leaving the selector in MAN as a formal omission, but considered that it would have been prudent to reset it.

The crew then had three chances to catch the error: the preflight procedure, the Before Start checklist and the After Takeoff checklist. The green MANUAL light should have been seen during preflight, take-off and climb. The AAIASB found that the manufacturer's checklists did not list the selector position explicitly and were "not consistent with good Human Factors principles".

A horn with two meanings

On the 737 the same intermittent horn warned of an unsafe take-off configuration on the ground and of a cabin altitude above 10,000 ft in flight. Most pilots hear it only on the ground, where it is tied, in memory and in muscle memory, to the thrust levers. The Board concluded that the crew, surprised and stressed, reacted to that familiar meaning, and that the horn, never silenced with the cut-out button, became a distraction rather than an alert. Numerous similar confusions had been reported worldwide.

Preoccupation and the master caution

The master caution could have been triggered by the equipment cooling lights or by the passenger oxygen deployment, and because the first was not cancelled, the second did not produce a new alert. The crew became preoccupied with the cooling problem and did not detect the pressurisation problem. The Board believed that the captain possibly left his seat to reach the circuit breakers. Before hypoxia began to affect them, inadequate crew resource management contributed to the failure to diagnose the problem.

Hypoxia and time of useful consciousness

Hypoxia is insidious: it degrades reasoning, particularly in novel situations, before a pilot is aware of it. The Board found that the crew probably lost useful consciousness some time after 06:20:21, about 13 minutes after take-off, and that they did not don their oxygen masks. The report cites these average times of useful consciousness after a sudden loss of oxygen:

Altitude Moderate activity Sitting quietly
22,000 ft 5 minutes 10 minutes
25,000 ft 2 minutes 3 minutes
30,000 ft 45 seconds 1 minute 15 seconds
35,000 ft 30 seconds 45 seconds

The cabin altitude at FL340 was calculated at about 24,000 ft, and between 20,500 and 28,200 ft by Boeing. The passenger oxygen system, designed to last about 12 minutes, allowed at least some occupants to stay conscious during the climb. Three of the four portable oxygen bottles had most likely been used.

The cabin crew

It could not be determined what the cabin crew did after the masks dropped or whether they tried to reach the flight deck. The Board found that no international procedures told cabin crew what to do when the masks deploy and the aircraft keeps climbing without a word from the flight deck. The attendant who reached the cockpit made the MAYDAY calls without pressing the transmit key, and the Board concluded that nobody in his condition could have regained control of a 737 with an engine stopped.

Organisation and oversight

The operator's audits had repeatedly recorded an inadequate quality system, weak operational control and manuals not kept up to date; its After Takeoff checklist had not been updated to Boeing's latest revision. The Cyprus Department of Civil Aviation had lacked resources and qualified staff since at least 1999, and ICAO audits recorded 46.57 % non-implementation of its corrective action plans. Air traffic control's handling of the lost radio contact did not contribute to the accident. At its request, the comments of Cyprus on the draft were appended to the final report.

Cabin pressure and bleed air control panels on the overhead panel of a Boeing 737-800.
Cabin pressure and bleed air panels on a Boeing 737-800, a later version of the type, not the accident aircraft. The pressurisation mode selector offers AUTO, ALTN and MAN; in MAN the outflow valve moves only when a pilot drives it.-- Wsombeck 11:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)wsombeck · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons

Probable cause and contributing factors

The AAIASB listed three direct causes:

  1. "Non-recognition that the cabin pressurization mode selector was in the MAN (manual) position" during the preflight procedure, the Before Start checklist and the After Takeoff checklist.
  2. "Non-identification of the warnings and the reasons for the activation of the warnings (cabin altitude warning horn, passenger oxygen masks deployment indication, Master Caution), and continuation of the climb."
  3. "Incapacitation of the flight crew due to hypoxia, resulting in continuation of the flight via the flight management computer and the autopilot, depletion of the fuel and engine flameout, and impact of the aircraft with the ground."

The latent causes were the operator's deficiencies in organisation, quality management and safety culture; the regulatory authority's long-standing inadequate oversight; inadequate application of crew resource management; and the ineffectiveness of the manufacturer's measures after earlier pressurisation incidents. Contributing factors were the failure to return the selector to AUTO after unscheduled maintenance, the lack of international cabin crew procedures for mask deployment during a continuing climb, and the ineffectiveness of international authorities in enforcing corrective action plans after audits.

Safety recommendations and what changed

After interim recommendations, Boeing prepared a new section on the cabin altitude warning for its 737 Flight Crew Training Manuals and inserted a step in the maintenance manual's cabin pressure leak test telling the engineer to move the mode selector to AUTO. Boeing also prepared revised crew procedures for the cabin altitude warning, but responded that changing the colour of the MANUAL indication, as the AAIASB suggested, could mislead crews. The Hellenic area control centre added a radar-label indication for flights without radio contact and a three-minute limit for contacting a flight that has missed a reporting point.

On 22 June 2006 the FAA issued Airworthiness Directive 2006-13-13 for all Boeing 737s. It required the Airplane Flight Manual to state that the pressurisation mode selector should be in AUTO before take-off, and a new procedure: if an intermittent horn sounds in flight, oxygen masks and regulators on at 100 %, establish crew communication, then carry out the cabin altitude warning or rapid depressurisation checklist.

The final report asked EASA and the JAA to require:

With ICAO, they were asked to consider cockpit voice recorders covering the entire flight, recording of company communications with aircraft, cabin altitude on the flight data recorder and flight deck image recorders, and to track and enforce the findings of international safety audits. The Republic of Cyprus was asked to give its reorganising Department of Civil Aviation the resources it needed.

Lessons for pilots

An intermittent horn in flight means cabin altitude. A take-off configuration warning cannot sound in the climb. Treat an intermittent horn in flight as a cabin altitude warning until proved otherwise: masks on, 100 % oxygen, crew communication, then the checklist. See decompression.

Exam tip: Time of useful consciousness shortens sharply with altitude and with activity. In the table the report cites, it is 2 to 3 minutes at 25,000 ft but only 30 to 45 seconds at 35,000 ft. In a gradual loss of pressurisation, as here, hypoxia can impair judgement before any symptom is noticed. See hypoxia and hyperventilation.

Check the mode, not just the numbers. Know where your aircraft's pressurisation mode, cabin altitude and differential pressure are shown, and confirm them on the After Takeoff check and again in the climb. On the 737, AUTO is the normal mode and MAN is a backup; the 737 pressurisation system and the principles of pressurisation control explain why a fixed outflow valve lets the cabin follow the aircraft up.

Fly first, troubleshoot second. The crew kept climbing while discussing cooling lights on the company frequency. When an unexplained warning appears during the climb, stopping the climb costs nothing and buys time.

Warning: A master caution left on hides the next one. Identify, acknowledge and cancel alerts, and silence a horn only once its cause has been understood.

Use the whole crew. Good crew resource management would have had one pilot flying and one reading the overhead panel. Cabin crew who see masks deployed while the aircraft is still climbing should tell the flight deck at once.

After maintenance, the flight deck is yours to verify. Switches may not be where the last flight left them. A full preflight scan of the overhead panel, with every selector checked against the normal position, is the defence the AAIASB found missing three times.

Probable cause

The AAIASB found three direct causes: the non-recognition that the cabin pressurisation mode selector was in the MAN position during the preflight procedure and the Before Start and After Takeoff checklists; the non-identification of the warnings and of the reasons for their activation, and continuation of the climb; and "incapacitation of the flight crew due to hypoxia", leading to fuel exhaustion and impact. Latent causes lay in the operator's organisation and safety culture, the regulator's oversight, crew resource management and the manufacturer's response to earlier pressurisation incidents.

Train this on v1prep

The theory behind this accident and the questions that test it, each with a worked explanation.

Question banks

In the Library

  • Hypoxia and HyperventilationCovers respiration and gas exchange, the types, stages and prevention of hypoxia, and how to recognise and correct hyperventilation.
  • Decompression and Emergency DescentCovers loss of cabin pressure, the emergency descent procedure, and the supplemental and first-aid oxygen requirements for crew and passengers.
Start practising →
EASA & FAA · PPL to ATPL · Free to start

Frequently asked questions

What caused the Helios Airways 522 crash?

The AAIASB found that the pressurisation mode selector had been left in MAN after maintenance and was not noticed during the preflight procedure and two checklists. The crew did not identify the cabin altitude warning and other alerts and continued the climb. Both pilots were incapacitated by hypoxia, the Boeing 737 flew on autopilot until its fuel ran out, and it crashed near Grammatiko. Latent causes included the operator's safety culture and weak regulatory oversight.

Why did the Helios 522 pilots not use their oxygen masks?

The investigators concluded that the crew mistook the cabin altitude warning horn for the takeoff configuration warning, which uses the same sound. Their first actions, disconnecting the autopilot and retarding the thrust levers, matched that interpretation. They then became preoccupied with equipment cooling alerts and did not recognise the pressurisation problem, so they did not don their oxygen masks, stop the climb or descend before hypoxia impaired them.

How high was the cabin altitude on Helios 522?

Calculations from the pressure controller's memory gave a cabin altitude of about 24,000 ft while the aircraft cruised at FL340; Boeing's calculation gave between 20,500 and 28,200 ft. The outflow valve had stayed at a fixed opening throughout the climb, so the cabin climbed almost with the aircraft. The AAIASB estimated that occupants without oxygen began to lose cognitive function about 2 to 3 minutes after the aircraft reached FL340.

Who was at the controls when Helios 522 crashed?

A male cabin attendant who had trained as a pilot entered the cockpit shortly before the left engine flamed out from fuel exhaustion and sat in the captain's seat. The investigators found that he tried to control the aircraft and made MAYDAY calls that were recorded but not transmitted. The AAIASB concluded that no one in his position, affected by hypoxia and stress, could have regained control of a 737 with one engine stopped.

What changed after the Helios Airways 522 accident?

Boeing added a step to its maintenance manual to return the pressurisation mode selector to AUTO after a cabin pressure leak test, and prepared revised crew training material on the warning horn. On 22 June 2006 the FAA issued Airworthiness Directive 2006-13-13, revising the flight manual so that the selector should be in AUTO before takeoff and oxygen masks are donned first when an intermittent horn sounds in flight. The AAIASB also recommended practical hypoxia training.

Sources and further reading

  1. AAIASB, Aircraft Accident Report 11/2006, Helios Airways Flight HCY522 (English text, hosted by the FAA)
  2. AAIASB, investigation report 11/2006 (report page)
  3. FAA Lessons Learned, Helios Airways Flight 522, Boeing 737-300, Grammatiko, 14 August 2005
  4. FAA AC 61-107B, Aircraft Operations at Altitudes Above 25,000 Feet MSL and/or Mach Numbers Greater Than .75
  5. FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Hypoxia pilot safety brochure

Crash Investigations pages summarise official investigation reports for study and exam preparation. The investigating body's report is the authoritative account and prevails wherever it differs from this page. Under ICAO Annex 13, an investigation exists to prevent accidents, not to apportion blame or liability.